you the user have to set it up correctly for best results. In comparison to the total number of users, most PCs are running. The software installer includes 24 files. Thus, you'll get poorer quality output in the case that it doesn't need done. The main program executable is XMedia Recode.exe. So if you turn on de-interlace, every frame is de-interlaced regardless of whether it needs it or not. As far as I know, they don't have interlace detection filtering. You won't get better quality as the filters protect against quality loss to begin with. If you know your sources are defiantly progressive, you can just turn the 2 filters off and gain the speed back. We've decided that the performance hit is worth it as users then don't have to understand what this is. If you don't de-interlace a interlaced source, you'll get interlacing artefacts in the output which are nasty. i have some problem with xmedia recode latest version 圆4 for some test i need to convert my original video file mkv to mp4 with xvid codec and audio on mp3 VBR original video is 1920x800. If it does need de-interlaced then it's a moot point. If it doesn't need de-interlaced, it won't do anything. Update of ffmpeg Update of AOM AV1 (3.6.0) Codec Update of vpx (1.13. Interlace detection looks at your source and decides whether it needs de-interlaced or not. (That said that's with one sample file on one sample system but in general, given both apps use the same underlying encoder and likely same decoder, it should be within a pretty small gap) In my own testing HandBrake win's out but is more often than not within a margin of error or very slightly faster. Speeds in HandBrake vs xMedia, like of like on settings, should be very similar. Note, I don't believe xMedia has those same filters available so you'd probably have to switch to yadif on both sides to have equivalence. The "Fast 480p30" preset in HandBrake is essentially Quality RF 20, x264, fast preset, 3.1 with Interlace Detection and Decomb turned on and a hard cap of 480p resolution at 30fps Turn off Interlace detection and Decomb on the filters tab and you'll probably find any difference disappears all other settings equals. If you're doing multiple (batch conversions), keep an eye on duration before deleting any originals.The reason HandBrake is likely running slower is that there are a 2 filters that are default on which won't be in xMedia. If you're converting a single video at a time - I would recommend the latest version. So this thing runs "hot" vs other Video Converters I've used.ĭespite these short-comings, I really like this application. The conversions themselves are fine but xMedia Recode doesn't always pass the correct values to the job list (so far we're talking duration only).Īnother, smaller issue is the CPU usage which is always at 100% even when CPU Priority is set to the lower levels. Basically whatever appears on the job list (duration, conversion type, etc) is what you're going to get at the end. It doesn't happen all the time but often enough in my testing when loading and placing in the job list. It seems to take the duration of one of the videos (let's say 11 minutes) and force that duration on all other videos (even if the other videos are an hour long). When the list gets highlighted and added to the JOB list, you'll see the duration shortened. When loading a few videos for batch conversion, the program analyzes the selected files and you'll see specs for each video listed (including START and END times = duration). WARNING: I'm not certain how the previous versions handled multiple files (job list) but I'm working with version 2.2.9.7 and it fails to convert the complete video on many jobs I've given it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |